ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Persistence-confidence incongruence and engagement in translation learning: a response surface analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustaining engagement in demanding learning contexts is a central psychological challenge, yet relatively little is known about how translation learners' internal motivational resources work together to support such engagement. The present study examined whether the alignment between persistence and confidence at baseline was prospectively associated with subsequent engagement in translation learning among Chinese university students. A two-wave survey design was employed, with 620 students participating at Wave 1 and 510 matched responses retained at Wave 2. Persistence and confidence were measured at Wave 1, and engagement in translation learning was measured 4 weeks later at Wave 2. After confirmatory factor analyses supported the distinctiveness and reliability of the focal constructs, polynomial regression with response surface analysis was conducted to test associations between congruence and incongruence in persistence and confidence and later engagement. The results showed that engagement was generally higher when persistence and confidence were aligned and increased together. However, this positive association leveled off at higher levels of congruence. Engagement was also lower when the discrepancy between persistence and confidence was larger, regardless of the direction of the mismatch. These findings suggest that engagement in translation learning is associated not only with individual psychological resources in isolation, but also with the degree to which they are internally coordinated. Because persistence and confidence were measured concurrently at Wave 1, the results should be interpreted as temporal associations rather than evidence that psychological mismatch causally reduces engagement. The study contributes to the psychology of translation learning by applying a congruence perspective to the balance between effortful persistence and capability-related confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.