ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Attentional bias toward emotional faces in cognitive disengagement syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the conceptual overlap yet increasing distinction between cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), this study examined attentional bias toward emotional faces in adults with CDS and compared their patterns with those of individuals with ADHD to clarify distinct attentional processing profiles. Methods: Following an initial screening of 1,098 adults using the Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale and the Adult Concentration Inventory, 96 participants were recruited and categorized into four groups: CDS only ( Results: Results indicated that individuals with CDS (CDS only and CDS+ADHD groups) showed a trend toward a lower proportion of first fixations toward angry faces as compared to those without CDS. In addition, individuals with CDS exhibited longer dwell times for all emotional faces. In contrast, individuals with ADHD symptoms (ADHD only and CDS+ADHD groups) demonstrated greater dwell time specifically for angry faces as compared to those without ADHD symptoms. Discussion: These findings suggest that CDS may be associated with difficulty detecting angry faces at the early stage of attentional processing and with generalized difficulty disengaging from emotional faces at the later stage. By contrast, ADHD symptoms may be selectively associated with anger-specific attentional bias at the later stage. Overall, the present study suggests that CDS and ADHD may be characterized by distinct patterns of attentional processing in response to emotional faces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.