ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
User satisfaction with cochlear implant audio processors: population norms derived from a large-scale survey campaign.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cochlear implants (CIs) require an external audio processor (AP), which can impose responsibilities and challenges for the user. Monitoring user satisfaction is crucial to identify and address issues that may lead to reduced device usage. The audio processor satisfaction questionnaire (APSQ) was developed to measure user satisfaction across three subscales: user comfort, social life, and device usability. Methods: We analyzed 861 APSQ responses collected between 2019 and 2023 from CI users in Germany and the UK. Multivariable quantile and ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with satisfaction and daily usage duration. Population norm values were established for the total score and subscales. Results: Median total APSQ scores were high (8.7/10). Males and users with single-sided deafness (SSD) reported slightly lower satisfaction. Off-the-ear (OTE) processors produced marginally higher usability ratings. Higher APSQ scores were strongly associated with longer daily CI usage. Each additional point on the total score was associated with 44% higher odds of using the CI at least 3 h longer per day. SSD and bimodal users showed higher odds of shorter use relative to bilateral CI users. Item-level comparisons indicated greater wearing comfort with glasses for OTE users and with headwear for behind-the-ear (BTE) users. Conclusion: CI user satisfaction, as measured by the APSQ, is generally high and is positively associated with daily usage duration. The APSQ is a valuable tool for monitoring user experience and identifying populations at risk of reduced CI use. The population norm values facilitate the interpretation of clinically acquired APSQ scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.