ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model integrating tumor lesion and periprostatic adipose tissue for predicting bone metastasis in prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-based radiomics model incorporating features from both the tumor lesion and periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) for predicting synchronous bone metastasis (BM) in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 237 patients with histologically confirmed PCa who underwent prostate mpMRI between January 2021 and December 2024. Patients were randomly allocated to a training cohort (n = 165) and a validation cohort (n = 72) in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent clinical predictors of BM. Radiomics features were extracted from tumor lesions and PPAT on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2WI-FS), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Separate radiomics models were constructed for intratumoral, PPAT, and combined (intratumoral + PPAT) features. A combined clinical-radiomics model was established by integrating the radiomics score (Rad-score) with independent clinical predictors. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Multivariate analysis identified clinical T stage (OR = 5.00, 95% CI: 1.65-16.70; p = 0.006) and Ki-67 expression (OR = 4.61, 95% CI: 1.63-14.10; p = 0.005) as independent predictors of BM. The intratumoral radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.928 (training) and 0.835 (validation). The PPAT radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.859 (training) and 0.842 (validation). The combined radiomics model (intratumoral + PPAT) yielded AUCs of 0.955 (95% CI: 0.927-0.982) and 0.850 (95% CI: 0.745-0.954) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The combined clinical-radiomics model demonstrated AUCs of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.934-0.986) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.785-0.960), respectively. DCA indicated favorable clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: The combined model integrating PPAT and tumor radiomics features with clinical predictors demonstrated robust discriminative ability for predicting BM in newly diagnosed PCa. This non-invasive model may provide complementary risk stratification beyond conventional clinical assessment by identifying patients with potentially aggressive disease characteristics and supporting individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.