ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
AGI imagined: social AGI and the co-formation of human-AGI society.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The AI industry is advancing toward an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that will possess cognitive capabilities that are equal to or stronger than those of humans. While a purely computational AGI may be cognitively powerful, it will probably struggle to understand the human social environment. This gap needs both a theoretical and an applicative solution. This article provides the theoretical solution, specifying what such an AGI must contain and how it must be formed. We propose a theoretical construct of an AGI that will not only be computational but will also be capable to develop internal social understanding, internalize norms in a manner similar to humans, and act upon this social understanding. We call such AGI a "Social AGI." We argue that Social AGI cannot be developed only by using technical alignment or external governance. Instead, it must undergo a staged development in which visible social behavior gradually becomes social cognition and norm internalization. This process cannot be separated from the parallel support that human society must provide the effort of developing Social AGI. While AI systems may become more familiar and embedded in institutions and society itself, the public perceptions of risk will probably decline. This normalization will provide the basis for granting the Social AGI progressively higher levels of autonomy. In order to capture this process of mutual change, we develop a socio-technical concept of human-AGI co-formation. We differentiate co-formation from co-existence, which describes humans and AI operating side by side, and from co-evolution, which describes reciprocal and cyclic influence. Co-formation refers to a process in which at the beginning Social AGI is shaped exclusively by human society. However, as the process progresses, they shape together the basic conditions under which the AGI is developed. On the AGI side, this will require the capabilities to internalize norms, and to be able to function according to its roles. On the societal side, this will require to create several mechanisms of role assignment, training and socializing the AGI, and monitoring its value alignment. The most important characteristics society should develop is a public acceptance and justification for increasing the AGI's autonomy. Society may learn not only how to supervise the AGI, but also it may learn to trust it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.