ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Age-stratified adverse-event reporting signals of seven ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in FAERS: a disproportionality and time to onset study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes in molecularly selected malignancies, but trial populations do not fully represent the age and clinical heterogeneity encountered in routine care. Comparative post-marketing evidence on age-related and drug-specific reporting patterns remains limited. Methods: We analyzed US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System data from 2004 Q1 through 2026 Q1. The study included 38,479 primary-suspect reports with known age for crizotinib, entrectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, repotrectinib, cabozantinib, or ceritinib. Reports were stratified as 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, or ≥65 years. A preferred term (PT) was considered positive only when prespecified criteria for ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS were all met. We evaluated formal drug-exposure-by-age interactions, drug-level PT-spectrum similarity, clinical priority, and reported time to onset (TTO) with Weibull modeling. Results: Positive PT counts were 64, 159, 230, and 178 across the four age groups, respectively, and 299 in the all-age analysis. Of 255 PTs eligible for formal interaction testing, 127 had an interaction false-discovery rate <0.05; 95 remained after exclusion of concepts not interpretable as adverse events. Descriptive displays highlighted pediatric skeletal concerns and neurologic or functional vulnerability in older reports, while formal contrasts distinguished these patterns from within-stratum signal detection. Drug-level positive-PT spectra showed generally low pairwise similarity, and target-set overlap correlated weakly with signal-spectrum similarity (Spearman ρ = 0.212, P = 0.356). TTO was evaluable for 15,810 reports (41.1%). Weibull estimates were below one across fitted pooled age groups, consistent with an early-failure reporting pattern. Conclusion: These findings support surveillance based on both age and the prescribed agent rather than a uniform class profile. The early reporting pattern favors close assessment soon after treatment initiation. FAERS signals remain hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in longitudinal patient-level data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.