ReviewJournal of inflammation research2026
The Dual Role of Exosome-Mediated Central-Peripheral Immune Dialogue in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Associated Neuroinflammation.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is increasingly viewed as a multisystem disorder in which central-peripheral immune communication may modify neuroinflammation. Exosomes, an endosome-derived subset of extracellular vesicles (EVs), have been proposed as mediators of this communication, but the strength and disease specificity of the evidence require critical evaluation. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched from database inception to July 20, 2026, with supplementary citation tracking through Google Scholar and reference lists. Evidence was categorized as human ALS evidence, ALS-specific cellular or animal evidence, evidence from non-ALS neuroinflammatory models, or review-level background evidence. Results: Human studies have identified ALS-associated proteins and altered miRNA profiles in circulating EV-containing preparations, but their cellular origin, direction of transfer, and causal relevance remain uncertain. ALS-specific cellular and animal models support the possibility that EVs participate in intercellular protein transfer and modify glial inflammatory, phagocytic, antioxidant, and trophic responses. Some proposed mechanisms, including miR-216a-5p-mediated microglial regulation, are derived mainly from other neurological injury models and should be considered hypothesis-generating. Single-cell studies further indicate that ALS microglia occupy heterogeneous and overlapping states; therefore, M1/M2 terminology is used only as a simplified descriptive framework. Circulating EV cargo remains under investigation as a biomarker source, whereas the additional value of EV-associated neurofilament light chain and the diagnostic utility of TDP-43, SOD1, or miRNAs require independent validation. Therapeutic evidence remains predominantly preclinical, with only small, early, non-confirmatory human studies. Conclusion: EVs may participate in central-peripheral immune communication in ALS, but their causal role, cellular origin, in vivo trafficking, and clinical utility remain incompletely established. Standardized methods and rigorous mechanistic and clinical validation are required before EV-based biomarkers or therapies can be translated into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.