ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Food consumption and nutrient intake in children on day-care days: results from the nationwide German KiESEL study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Day-care (DC) centers are relevant nutritional environments for young children in Germany. Yet, little is known about food consumption and nutrient intake at DC centers. Objectives: To characterize meal consumption at DC centers, compare food consumption and nutrient intake on DC days versus non-DC days, and explore the contribution of foods consumed at DC centers to the total daily food consumption (TFC) and nutrient intake. Methods: The analysis is based on questionnaire and food record data (3 + 1 day) collected within the representative KiESEL study. The present subsample includes 1-5-year-old children with at least one DC day and one non-DC day ( Results: 93.7% of the children ate at least one breakfast and 45.5% ate three meals a day at DC centers regularly. On DC days, more beverages, vegetables, and less meat/sausages and unfavorable foods (e.g., sweets, soft drinks) (as %TFC) were consumed, and intakes of protein (% of energy intake, E%), fiber, calcium (mg/MJ) were higher, while fat intake (E%) was lower than on non-DC days. The diet at DC centers was higher in some favorable foods (e.g., vegetables, fruit, starchy side dishes), but lower in milk/milk products and unfavorable foods, resulting in higher intakes of fiber and lower intakes of mono-/disaccharides and calcium compared to the reference shares (i.e., share of TFC or energy intake at DC centers). Conclusion: DC days showed more characteristics of a healthy diet than did non-DC days, considerably owing to foods eaten at DC centers. The role of DC centers in Germany as important nutritional environments should be strengthened further by public health measures, e.g., obligatory quality standards for meals at DC centers, targeted support for health-minded public procurement, or increased access to meals at DC centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.