ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Empowerment or disempowerment? How generative AI consultation shapes the health decision-making among the new generation of older adults.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence has lowered the threshold for access to health information, but increased access does not equate to optimal use. While the new generation of older adults benefit from greater convenience, their decision-making risks have not decreased correspondingly, thereby constituting a new health decision-making paradox. To uncover the underlying mechanism by which generative AI health consultations influence decision quality, this study integrates triadic reciprocal determinism and metacognitive theory, constructing an analytical framework with "generative AI health consultation-intelligent information-health decision quality" as the core pathway. Intelligent information is divided into five stages: attention, perception, discernment, trust, and reliance. This study introduces intelligent boundary awareness, algorithmic pandering awareness, and health autonomy orientation as moderating variables, thereby characterizing differentiated effects under varying cognitive and behavioral contexts. Furthermore, this study employs a hybrid methodological approach that combines structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to test the model, identifying three types of high-quality health decision-making patterns: trust-reinforced, autonomous adaptive, and cognitive adoption modes. The results indicate that: (1) Generative AI health consultation improves decision quality not merely by increasing the supply of information, but by reshaping new generation of older adults' cognition and engagement patterns with intelligent information; (2) Intelligent boundary awareness, algorithmic pandering awareness, and health autonomy orientation significantly moderate the translation of intelligent information into decision quality, thereby revealing cognitive and agentic boundaries of decision efficacy; (3) The three identified patterns transcend linear explanations based on single factors, health decision quality depends on differentiated alignment among information cognition, technological relationships, and individual autonomy. Therefore, the key to enhancing the efficacy of generative AI health consultations is to shift from tool provision to empowerment, with a primary focus on strengthening intelligent information discernment, rational trust, and autonomous decision-making capabilities in the new generation of older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.