ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Perceived awareness, objective nutrition knowledge, and health beliefs about probiotics and prebiotics among adults in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Probiotics and prebiotics are increasingly promoted as functional food components. This growing visibility has not been matched by consistent public understanding of their definitions, dietary sources, and scientifically supported health claims. Against this background, this study assessed perceived awareness, objective knowledge, information sources, and health beliefs related to probiotics and prebiotics among adults in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It also examined factors associated with adequate objective knowledge. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 744 adult UAE residents between April and May 2026. Perceived awareness was measured using a 10-point scale. Objective knowledge was assessed using four items on definitions and natural dietary sources, and adequate knowledge was defined as at least three correct answers. In addition, information sources and health beliefs were assessed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with adequate objective knowledge. Results: Mean perceived awareness was 4.6 ± 2.8, and 18.0% of participants reported high awareness. Mean objective knowledge was 1.9 ± 1.6, with 39.9% demonstrating adequate knowledge. Correct responses were highest for the probiotic definition (55.8%) and lowest for natural prebiotic sources (37.0%). High perceived awareness and high objective knowledge overlapped in only 10.1% of participants. In the multivariable model, internet/websites (90.3%) and social media (84.9%) were the most frequently reported information sources, but neither was independently associated with adequate knowledge. By contrast, receiving information from healthcare professionals was positively associated with adequate knowledge [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.83, Conclusion: Perceived awareness did not consistently correspond to objective knowledge. These findings indicate a nutrition-related knowledge gap, particularly for prebiotics and their natural dietary sources. Digital nutrition communication should be strengthened by professional guidance and clearer messages that distinguish probiotic and prebiotic concepts, dietary sources, and scientifically supported health claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.