Trial reportFrontiers in neurology2026
The effects of gross motor exercises on perception and praxis in children with motor coordination difficulties-randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Child psychomotor development is holistic, and pediatric rehabilitation increasingly emphasizes multidisciplinary approaches. Movement interventions can influence not only physical but also cognitive and executive functions. Midline crossing exercises may stimulate frontal-parietal networks, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and superior parietal cortex, involved in praxis and executive control. However, their long-term effects in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) remain unclear. Methods: This study examined whether midline crossing exercises improve perceptual and praxis functions more than exercises without this element, and explored their relationship with bilateral integration. Twenty-two children aged 6-9 with DCD symptoms participated in a randomized trial. They were assigned to a research group (with midline crossing) or a control group (without it), both following a Bilateral Integration program. The intervention lasted 9-10 weeks within a 15-16-week cycle, with assessments of perception, praxis, and bilateral integration processes at three time points (t Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in Sequencing Praxis and Bilateral Motor Coordination, with no between-group differences at specific time points. However, improvements appeared earlier in the research group (t Discussion: Bilateral Integration exercises improve praxis, coordination, and task performance speed in children with DCD symptoms. Midline crossing may accelerate therapeutic effects and selectively enhance certain functions, supporting integrated models of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.