Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769028›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026

Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Multimodal Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.

Xiangling Lv, Chen Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangling LvDepartment of Nursing, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.
Chen WuDepartment of Nursing, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Medicine, and International School of Medicine, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic inflammatory bowel disorders characterized by complex etiology and significant clinical heterogeneity. With the evolution of the "treat-to-target" (T2T) concept, progressive endpoints such as endoscopic mucosal remission, histological remission, and deep remission have become key outcomes in the management of IBD. Traditional endoscopic assessment of IBD suffers from issues such as high subjectivity, lack of consistency, limited quantitative capabilities, and reliance on specialist experience; artificial intelligence (AI) is driving the evolution of endoscopic assessment toward standardization, objectivity, and real-time analysis. AI has made significant progress in areas such as UC activity scoring, CD ulcer identification, small bowel capsule endoscopy image analysis, relapse prediction, and tumor monitoring; in selected datasets or experimental settings, some of its performance metrics approach expert levels. Research trends are gradually shifting from single-image analysis toward multimodal decision-support systems that integrate endoscopic, pathological, biomarker, and clinical information, which are expected to enhance the objectivity of IBD diagnosis, treatment, and efficacy evaluation. However, current challenges include data heterogeneity, inconsistent standards, insufficient external validation, limited interpretability, and inadequate ethical and regulatory frameworks. This article reviews the progress, technical approaches, clinical value, and future directions of AI applications in IBD endoscopy, focusing on the transition from subjective scoring to AI-based digital inflammation phenotyping.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCrohn’s diseasedeep learningendoscopyinflammatory bowel diseaseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID42769028
PMCPMC13590270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.