ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Multimodal Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic inflammatory bowel disorders characterized by complex etiology and significant clinical heterogeneity. With the evolution of the "treat-to-target" (T2T) concept, progressive endpoints such as endoscopic mucosal remission, histological remission, and deep remission have become key outcomes in the management of IBD. Traditional endoscopic assessment of IBD suffers from issues such as high subjectivity, lack of consistency, limited quantitative capabilities, and reliance on specialist experience; artificial intelligence (AI) is driving the evolution of endoscopic assessment toward standardization, objectivity, and real-time analysis. AI has made significant progress in areas such as UC activity scoring, CD ulcer identification, small bowel capsule endoscopy image analysis, relapse prediction, and tumor monitoring; in selected datasets or experimental settings, some of its performance metrics approach expert levels. Research trends are gradually shifting from single-image analysis toward multimodal decision-support systems that integrate endoscopic, pathological, biomarker, and clinical information, which are expected to enhance the objectivity of IBD diagnosis, treatment, and efficacy evaluation. However, current challenges include data heterogeneity, inconsistent standards, insufficient external validation, limited interpretability, and inadequate ethical and regulatory frameworks. This article reviews the progress, technical approaches, clinical value, and future directions of AI applications in IBD endoscopy, focusing on the transition from subjective scoring to AI-based digital inflammation phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.