ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Development of interpretable machine learning models for predicting the probability of sepsis in patients with pulmonary fibrosis in the intensive care unit: based on MIMIC-IV and multi-database validation.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited by small sample size, single-institution design, and insufficient comprehensive external validation across heterogeneous healthcare systems, no study to date has systematically validated the predictive performance of machine learning models for sepsis occurrence in an intensive care unit (ICU) population with concomitant pulmonary fibrosis through multiple large-scale databases. Methods: This retrospective multi-database study utilized two large databases to establish and validate a machine learning model for predicting the probability of sepsis occurrence in ICU patients with pulmonary fibrosis. In this study, 542 patients from the MIMIC-IV database were divided into a training set (381 patients) and an internal validation set (161 patients) in a 7:3 ratio, and external validation was performed on the MIMIC-III (186 patients) database. Six machine learning algorithms were employed: Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), Lightweight Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Baseline variables were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression to identify potential predictors. The interpretability of the model was evaluated using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis. Results: The entire cohort consisted of 728 ICU patients with pulmonary fibrosis. We identified nine consistently crucial clinical characteristics, including gender, dementia, pneumonia, antibiotics, nephrotoxic drugs, glucocorticoids, sequential organ failure assessment (Sofa) score, red blood cell distribution width, and total serum calcium. The ANN algorithm performed optimally, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878 in the training set, 0.837 in the internal validation set, and 0.857 in the MIMIC-III external validation set. SHAP analysis indicated that Sofa was the most influential predictor, followed by antibiotics and pneumonia. Additionally, a web tool was developed to facilitate the prediction of sepsis probability in clinical practice. Conclusions: This study is the first to develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting sepsis in ICU patients with pulmonary fibrosis across multiple databases. The ANN model, combined with SHAP interpretability, provides a reliable decision-making tool for clinical decision support, and its consistency has been verified in two databases, including our internal validation cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.