ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2026
Assisted cycling in non-ambulant adults with cerebral palsy: exploratory effects and feasibility in residential care.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAdults with cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification System, GMFCS, levels III-V) have severely impaired motor function, causing fatigue, pain, constipation, and sleep disturbance, reducing life quality. Whether standard exercise is feasible or beneficial in this population is unknown, as spasticity, low muscle mass, and cognitive challenges may limit participation. Unable to engage in conventional exercise, they require tailored modalities. This study investigated whether assisted cycling is feasible and could improve key symptoms.
methods14 adults with cerebral palsy (GMFCS III-V) completed a 10-week control period and 10 weeks of supervised, assisted cycling (3 x 20 min/week). Assessments at baseline, post-control, and post-exercise included key symptoms, feasibility, Gross Motor Function Measure-88, and a timed 1-km cycle test (time, power output, cadence).
resultsMedian attendance was 24/30 sessions. Heart rate increased during exercise (median 25.5 bpm). No significant group-level changes were observed, but individual improvements in pain, constipation, and power output were observed in some. Two participants experienced moderate adverse events affecting daily living.
conclusionAssisted cycling is feasible and generally well tolerated in non-ambulant adults with cerebral palsy. While no group-level effects were detected, exploratory individual improvements in symptoms and cycling performance were observed in some, supporting further research on tailored exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.