ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2026
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish version of theWender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale.
Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS).
methodThe study included 146 individuals diagnosed with attentiondeficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 86 healthy controls (ADHD group: age=24.46±5.82; control group: age=24.91±2.21). In addition to the WRAADDS, the Adult ADD/ADHD DSM-IV-Based Diagnostic and Assessment Scale, the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were administered.
resultsThe ADHD group showed significantly higher total and subscale scores on the WRAADDS compared to the control group (p <0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original model demonstrated good fit (χ²=34.392, df=13, p=0.001). Under Factor 1, the dimensions of inattention and disorganization were included, whereas hyperactivity/restlessness, temper, affective lability, emotional overreactivity, and impulsivity were included under Factor 2. In the internal consistency analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.97 for Factor 1 and 0.59 for Factor 2, respectively. The WRAADDS total score showed significant positive correlations with the total scores of other ADHD scales (p <0.01). No significant correlations were found between WRAADDS total score and the anxiety or depression subscales of the HADS (p>0.05).
conclusionThe Turkish version of the WRAADDS is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that comprehensively assesses adult ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.