ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Unmasking preclinical Alzheimer's pathology: auditory distraction cost and occupational reserve jointly discriminate amyloid positivity in subjective cognitive decline.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionConventional cognitive instruments exhibit limited efficacy in detecting insidious cognitive decline in subjective cognitive decline (SCD) due to neural compensation. We hypothesized that auditory distraction during a visual memory task would unmask preclinical amyloid beta (Aβ) vulnerability.
methodsWe evaluated 112 participants (SCD and mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) using the MemTrax test under quiet and noisy conditions to quantify distraction costs (d-MTxc). Aβ status and cognitive reserve were assessed via positron emission tomography and the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq).
resultsAβ-positive SCD individuals performed normally in quiet but showed higher d-MTxc than Aβ-negative peers (11.17 ± 5.762 vs 6.67 ± 5.096). Higher CRIq-WorkingActivity (CRIW) scores identified Aβ positivity and moderated performance. The combination of d-MTxc and CRIW accurately classified Aβ positivity (AUC = 0.836), whereas MCI individuals exhibited metabolic network fragmentation. DISCUSSION: Auditory distraction taxes cognitive capacity to expose compensatory failures coupled with Aβ burden. This paradigm, interacting with occupational reserve, offers a promising digital biomarker framework for preclinical Alzheimer's screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.