Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42768489›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Enhancing diagnostic precision for BI-RADS 4a breast nodules: A multimodal AI model integrating ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic signatures, and clinical profiles.

Jun Yang, Longman Long, Guang Li, Jian Zeng, Caixiao Peng, Jingting Yan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun Yang *Ultrasound Department, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Heyang, Hunan, China.
Longman Long *Ultrasound Department, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Heyang, Hunan, China.
Guang LiDepartment of Urology Surgery, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Heyang, Hunan, China.
Jian ZengUltrasound Department, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Heyang, Hunan, China.
Caixiao PengUltrasound Department, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Heyang, Hunan, China.
Jingting YanUltrasound Department, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Heyang, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1953-2277

Funding

2024 Annual Guiding Plan Project of Hengyang zdx202401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4a nodules represent a diagnostic dilemma, with a malignancy rate ranging from 2% to 10%. The majority of these nodules prove benign after biopsy, leading to unnecessary invasive procedures, patient anxiety, and healthcare costs. Current clinical practice lacks a reliable, noninvasive tool to accurately distinguish benign from malignant BI-RADS 4a lesions. Emerging evidence suggests that integrating multiparametric ultrasound data with clinical factors through artificial intelligence may improve diagnostic precision, but a validated multimodal model specifically for this ambiguous category is lacking. PURPOSE: To develop and validate a multimodal artificial intelligence model that integrates ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic features, and clinical data for the accurate differentiation of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4a breast nodules, with the ultimate goal of supporting clinical decisionmaking and safely reducing unnecessary biopsies.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter study enrolled 350 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4a nodules from 331 patients in one tertiary hospital and two secondary hospitals. Clinical data, grayscale ultrasound images, and hemodynamic parameters were collected for each nodule. Radiomics features were extracted from the ultrasound images. A multimodal fusion model was constructed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithm following feature selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The model was developed and hyperparameter-tuned on a training set (n = 260) using nested cross-validation and was evaluated on a temporally independent test set (n = 90). Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

resultsOn the independent test set, the multimodal LightGBM model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99), with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 86.1% (95% CI: 75.8%-93.1%). Its performance was significantly superior to baseline classifiers including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest (all p < 0.05). SHAP analysis identified wavelet-transformed texture features, the presence of a penetrating vessel, and BRCA mutation status as the top predictors of malignancy. Applying this model could have potentially avoided 32.4% (24/74) of unnecessary biopsies on benign nodules while maintaining perfect sensitivity.

conclusionA multimodal AI model based on LightGBM can accurately differentiate benign and malignant BI-RADS 4a breast nodules. It shows significant potential as a clinical decision-support tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies without compromising sensitivity, enabling more precise management for this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsHemodynamicsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiomicsUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective Studiesbiopsy reductionBI‐RADS 4abreast nodulesLightGBMmultimodal artificial intelligenceradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42768489
PMCPMC13594395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.