Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42768414›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Selected Measurement Properties of Slovenian Version of Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale (CECSS-SLO).

Urška Fekonja, Matej Strnad, Zvonka Fekonja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Urška FekonjaEmergency Department, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1576-3022
Matej StrnadEmergency Department, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-557X
Zvonka FekonjaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-8843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Consumer Emergency Satisfaction Scale (CECSS) into Slovenian to evaluate selected measurement properties of the CECSS-SLO.

backgroundPatient satisfaction with emergency department (ED) care represents an important quality indicator in healthcare provision. Instruments measuring satisfaction among older ED patients are scarce, and their cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation remain limited. CECSS assesses satisfaction with nursing care in the ED and has shown promising validity in international settings.

methodsA methodological cross-sectional study was conducted in Slovenian EDs. The instrument was translated and culturally adapted using forward-backwards translation, and expert assessment of content validity, face validity, internal consistency reliability and cultural suitability, using principal component analysis. Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Ethical approval was obtained.

resultsContent validity was assessed by 10 nursing experts with a PhD degree and demonstrated excellent item- and scale-level validity. Face validity and cultural adaptation were evaluated separately by 10 experienced emergency care nurses, who assessed the clarity, comprehensibility and contextual suitability of the translated items. The patient-based psychometric evaluation was conducted among 288 patients from Slovenian EDs. PCA identified a three-component solution whose item composition differed from the previously reported structure. Several items cross-loaded between components, indicating ambiguity in their component membership. The three components were identified as caring, information and dissatisfaction. Internal consistency reliability was high, with alpha and omega coefficients surpassing acceptable thresholds.

conclusionThe CECSS-SLO demonstrated satisfactory content validity and internal consistency for assessing patient satisfaction with nursing care in Slovenian EDs. Further studies should evaluate additional measurement properties including test-retest reliability, measurement error, cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance and responsiveness. Future studies should also formally test the proposed three-component structure using confirmatory factor analysis, including models that explicitly evaluate a possible method effect associated with the negatively worded dissatisfaction items. IMPACT: No validated questionnaire has yet been available in Slovenia to assess the quality of nursing care in the ED. CECSS enables systematic evaluation of patient experience, identification of areas for improvement and implementation of targeted quality initiatives. The CECSS-SLO provides a culturally adapted instrument with initial evidence supporting selected measurement properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The CECSS-SLO enables the structured assessment of patients' satisfaction with nursing care in Slovenian EDs. Its use may support the identification of areas for improvement and the development of targeted strategies to strengthen patient-centred nursing care and the overall quality of care in EDs. REPORTING

methodThe cross-sectional component of the study was reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement, whereas reporting of the evaluation of measurement properties was guided by the COSMIN framework. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient SatisfactionPsychometricsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSloveniaSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingadultscross‐cultural adaptationemergency departmentnursing carepatient satisfactionprincipal component analysispsychometric evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42768414
PMCPMC13593922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.