ArticleTrials2026
Children's participation in assent to paediatric oncology research: experiences of children, siblings and parents.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch is essential for improving outcomes in paediatric oncology, yet decisions about research participation often occur during emotionally vulnerable periods for families. Although children's assent is ethically required, it is not always meaningfully implemented in practice. Understanding how children, siblings and parents experience the child's involvement in the assent process, including their attitudes towards research, is crucial for promoting ethically sound research and supporting genuine child participation. The aim of this study was to describe how children with cancer, siblings and parents experience the child's assent process during research recruitment in paediatric oncology, with particular attention to its motivational and relational dimensions.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study design. Interviews were undertaken with children with cancer (n = 11), siblings (n = 17) and parents (n = 9) regarding their experiences of recruitment to various types of research in Sweden. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsTwo main themes were identified: a moral and emotional commitment to research, and relational assent-trust, loyalty and parental mediation. Children, siblings and parents described research participation as meaningful and morally significant in a vulnerable situation. Children's involvement in assent ranged from active participation to limited influence, with some decisions made primarily by parents. Decisions about research participation were shaped by relational dynamics, in which trust, loyalty, and emotional vulnerability and parental mediation played central roles.
conclusionsFamilies are strongly motivated to contribute to research in paediatric oncology. However, sustaining trust and safeguarding research integrity require consistent and meaningful implementation of children's assent. Child-centred, flexible, and context-sensitive assent processes are key, alongside ethical awareness of how relational dynamics shape children's autonomy. Recognising parents as key partners is essential for upholding both ethical standards and children's rights in paediatric research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.