ArticleBMC proceedings2026
Fostering cross-community collaboration to advance pandemic and epidemic intelligence.
Article in BMC proceedings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The twelfth session of the WHO Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence Innovation Forum focused on how cross-community collaboration can accelerate progress in pandemic and epidemic intelligence. The session explored how the Collaboratory, a WHO digital initiative connecting diverse communities of practice, fosters co-creation, supports the development of collaborative analytical tools, and strengthens the translation of evidence-base into public health action. Through a combination of short presentations and a panel discussion, the session examined key Collaboratory initiatives, including the Global Repository of Epidemiological Parameters (grEPI), AI-enabled pipelines for evidence synthesis, the Epiverse toolkit for outbreak analysis, and semantic search tools to improve the discoverability of epidemiological resources. Discussions addressed challenges of integration into national public health systems, governance models, sustainability, capacity-building, AI reliability, and ethical use. Across the session a common message emerged: advancing epidemic intelligence requires not only new tools but also sustained collective action, trust, and shared ownership across sectors, disciplines, and regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.