Observational studyBMC public health2026
From freshman to graduate: longitudinal analysis of student health status in sport and health sciences.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniversity years are considered a critical period for the development of long-term health behaviors. However, evidence on longitudinal health trajectories in students is limited, particularly regarding objectively measured physiological outcomes. This study aimed to examine changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, anthropometrics, blood pressure, and cardiovascular risk factors during undergraduate studies, as well as the influence of physical activity, sex, and age.
methodsThis longitudinal observational study included 128 students (mean age at baseline 21.0 ± 2.1 years; 75% female) enrolled in sport science or health science programs at the Technical University of Munich. Participants underwent comprehensive physiological assessments at baseline and follow-up (mean interval 2.53 ± 0.60 years), including cardiopulmonary exercise testing, body composition analysis, blood pressure, and heart rate measurements, and a structured medical history interview supplemented with questions on smoking status, alcohol consumption, weekly training volume, and dietary patterns (omnivorous, vegetarian, or vegan). Paired-samples t-tests were used to compare baseline and follow-up measurements; additionally, linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate longitudinal changes and predictors of individual trajectories.
resultsIn the unadjusted paired analysis, VO₂peak increased significantly from baseline to follow-up (p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.434), accompanied by a reduction in resting heart rate (p < .001, Cohen's d = 0.378), whereas maximal power output remained unchanged. Body weight, BMI, and body fat percentage remained largely stable, whereas muscle mass increased significantly in the unadjusted paired analysis (p = .006). However, after adjustment for sex, age, study program, and weekly training volume in the mixed-effects model, no statistically significant independent main effect of time on VO₂peak was observed. Higher weekly training volume was independently associated with higher VO₂peak, whereas sex, age, and study program did not moderate longitudinal trajectories.
conclusionsIn this cohort of students in sport and health science programs, several key health indicators remained stable or showed favorable changes during undergraduate studies. Although VO₂peak increased in the unadjusted within-subject comparison, this increase was not attributable to an independent effect of time after adjustment for relevant covariates. Higher weekly training volume was independently associated with higher cardiorespiratory fitness but did not significantly moderate changes in VO₂peak over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.