SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Alterations of oral microbiome in oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), including conditions such as Oral lichen planus, Oral leukoplakia, Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and Oral submucous fibrosis are associated with an increased risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in the oral microbiome may contribute to the pathogenesis of these disorders and their malignant transformation. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on oral microbiome composition and diversity in patients with OPMDs.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify eligible human studies published through August 2025. Studies evaluating oral microbiome profiles in patients with clinically and/or histopathologically diagnosed oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) were included. Data on study characteristics, sampling and analytical methods, microbial diversity, and differentially abundant taxa were extracted independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Owing to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively.
resultsA total of 56 studies were included, comprising 30 studies of Oral lichen planus, 9 of Oral leukoplakia, and 17 examining other OPMDs. 16srRNA sequencing was mostly used and whole unstimulated saliva was the most frequently collected specimen. The most prevalent microbial phyla identified in OPMD patients included Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria, but the direction and magnitude of changes varied across OPMD subtypes and sampling methods. Several studies reported an increase in pathogenic species such as Porphyromonas and Prevotella, while commensal bacteria like Streptococcus were less abundant. Findings concerning microbial richness and diversity were inconsistent.
conclusionsOral microbial dysbiosis is a common feature of oral potentially malignant disorders; however, a reproducible microbial signature has not yet been established. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, sampling strategies, and analytical approaches limits causal inference and clinical applicability. Future standardized longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the role of the oral microbiome in malignant transformation and its potential utility as a prognostic biomarker.
trial registrationProspero registration number: CRD42024516735.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.