ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Role of surgeon seniority in predicting surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification surgery: a machine learning study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether surgeon seniority influences postoperative astigmatic change after phacoemulsification cataract surgery and to assess the performance of machine-learning models in predicting postoperative astigmatic outcomes using preoperative clinical data.
methodsThis study included 169 eyes of 169 patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Surgeons were categorized as residents (n = 101) or specialists (n = 68). Astigmatism was quantified using both classical magnitude-based analysis and vector decomposition. Potential determinants of postoperative astigmatic change were evaluated using multivariable regression analyses. Machine-learning models, including Gradient Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machine models, were used to predict classical and vector astigmatism outcomes. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error, root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination.
resultsOf the 169 eyes, 101 were operated on by residents and 68 by specialists. Postoperative astigmatic change did not differ significantly between resident- and specialist-performed procedures in either classical or vector analyses. Within the resident group, increasing surgical seniority was not associated with postoperative astigmatic change. In multivariable analysis, preoperative cylindrical error was the only significant predictor in the vector model, whereas no significant predictor was identified in the classical model. Overall, machine-learning models demonstrated limited predictive performance, with only modest utility for classical astigmatism and poor explanatory performance for vector outcomes.
conclusionSurgeon seniority was not a significant determinant of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Machine-learning models based on preoperative clinical data provided only limited predictive value, particularly for vector astigmatism outcomes. Incorporating intraoperative variables may improve future predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.