Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42768324›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2026

The effect of cycloplegia on corneal power and diameter measured by an auto-kerato-refractometer in presbyopic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Navid Elmi Sadr, Leila Ghiasian, Yasaman Hadi, Ramyar Hariri

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04932213 (Comparison of the Effect of Tropicamide 0.5% and Tropicamide 1% on Intraocular Pressure, Pupil Size, Keratometry and Anterior Chamber Parameters in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04932213 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of the Effect of Tropicamide 0.5% and Tropicamide 1% on Intraocular Pressure, Pupil Size, Keratometry and Anterior Chamber Parameters in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemnan University of Medical SciencesRan2021 to 2021Enrolled98ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsTropicamide Ophthalmic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Navid Elmi SadrClinical Research Development Unit, Kowsar Educational, Research and Therapeutic Hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. navid.elmi.sadr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-4390
Leila GhiasianEye Research Center, Eye Department, The Five Senses Health Institute, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yasaman HadiEye Research Center, Eye Department, The Five Senses Health Institute, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramyar HaririClinical Research Development Unit, Kowsar Educational, Research and Therapeutic Hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the effect of cycloplegia on keratometry and horizontal white to white (WTW) measurements in presbyopic patients with type 2 diabetes.

methodsThe post-hoc analysis included 88 eyes from 88 patients with type 2 diabetes aged >40 years. Flat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), corneal astigmatism (CA), and WTW were measured using the RC-5000 auto kerato-refractometer (Tomey Inc., Nagoya, Japan), before and thirty minutes after the instillation of two drops (administered five minutes apart) of either 0.5% (46 patients) or 1% tropicamide (42 patients).

resultsThe mean changes in Kf, Ks, Km, CA, and WTW were - 0.01 ± 0.26 D, -0.05 ± 0.23 D, -0.03 ± 0.19 D, -0.04 ± 0.31 D, and 0.05 ± 0.24 mm, respectively, in the 0.5% tropicamide group. These values were - 0.07 ± 0.28 D, 0.01 ± 0.23 D, -0.03 ± 0.21 D, 0.08 ± 0.29 D, and 0.04 ± 0.15 mm, respectively, in the 1% tropicamide group. The changes following cycloplegia were not statistically significant (P ˃ 0.05).

conclusionsPost-cycloplegia keratometry and WTW measurements were comparable to pre-cycloplegia values in presbyopic patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that these measurements can be reliably obtained after cycloplegia.

trial registrationIRCT.ir, registration number: IRCT20200829048553N1, 2021-05-31. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, ID: NCT04932213, 2021-06-21.

Indexed as

CorneaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2MydriaticsPresbyopiaRefraction, OcularTropicamideAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMydriaticsTropicamideCorneaCycloplegiaDiabetesKeratometryTropicamideWTW

Identifiers

PMID42768324
PMCPMC13591858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.