ArticleEuropean radiology2026
MRI-based fetal gestational age estimation using a structure-aware self-supervised network.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a structure-aware self-supervised deep learning model that leverages global edge information to reduce gestational age (GA) estimation error from fetal brain MRI and improve clinical reliability. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective collection of 1630 fetal brain coronal T2-weighted MR images from 207 singleton pregnancies (mean GA, 30 ± 8 weeks; median, 34 weeks; range, 22-38 weeks) acquired between January 2019 and July 2023. GA, determined from the last menstrual period and the first-trimester ultrasound, served as the reference standard. Subjects were randomly split into a training set (80%) and an independent test set (20%) on a patient level. Model performance on the test set was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and the coefficient of determination (R²), with 95% confidence intervals obtained by bootstrap resampling.
resultsThe proposed model achieved an MAE of 0.793 weeks (95% CI, 0.574-0.860) and an R² of 0.934 (95% CI, 0.918-0.967) for GA estimation from routine clinical MRI. Predicted GAs showed a strong linear association with the reference GAs (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe proposed structure-aware self-supervised model enables accurate MRI-derived estimation of clinical GA from fetal brain MRI. This approach may complement conventional dating in selected cases; prospective and multi-center validation is required before clinical deployment. KEY POINTS: Question Can fetal brain MRI provide an accurate estimation of clinical gestational age when conventional clinical dating methods are unreliable in mid-to-late pregnancy? Findings In 207 pregnancies, SSFN-Net achieved lower MAE (0.79 weeks) and higher R² than existing deep-learning baselines on fetal brain MRI. Clinical relevance MRI-derived gestational age estimation may complement ultrasound or LMP-based clinical dating in selected cases, providing an additional quantitative reference for prenatal assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42768216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.