ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Automated intracorporeal tool exchange with the Symphera multi-tool prototype: a crossover evaluation of efficiency and surgeon workload in a porcine laparoscopic model.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional laparoscopic instrument exchange requires repeated trocar withdrawal, redirecting surgeon gaze and disrupting operative flow. The Symphera system enables intracorporeal tool-tip switching, but its impact on procedural efficiency, visual attention, and workload has not been evaluated in a controlled setting.
methodsTwo surgical fellows performed three standardised laparoscopic tasks (cholecystectomy, controlled hepatic bleeding, dissection-coagulation relay) under Symphera and conventional conditions in a live porcine crossover model. Primary outcomes were total task time and tool change time; secondary outcomes included gaze behaviour (eyes-on proportion, disruption events), subjective workload (SURG-TLX), device usability, and heart rate.
resultsMean total task time was 27.3 ± 10.9 vs. 33.9 ± 13.2 min (-19.6%; HL estimate -6.7 min, 95% CI -12.4 to -1.5; p = 0.10). Tool change time was reduced by 61.5% (3.6 ± 2.3 vs. 9.4 ± 6.6 min; HL estimate -5.2 min, 95% CI -9.7 to -3.4; p = 0.10). Intracorporeal exchanges were completed in a mean of 4.3 ± 4.4 s (75% within 5 s) versus 25.3 ± 23.4 s for extracorporeal exchanges. Eyes-on proportion was higher with Symphera (86.0 ± 10.9% vs. 78.1 ± 9.8%; HL estimate + 7.7 pp, 95% CI + 0.9 to + 14.8; p = 0.031), with instrument exchange as a gaze disruption cause markedly reduced. SURG-TLX scores were 44.8% lower with Symphera (40.2 ± 15.8 vs. 72.9 ± 19.8), with reductions across all six dimensions.
conclusionSymphera demonstrated favourable trends in procedural efficiency, gaze behaviour, and subjective workload versus conventional instrument exchange. The convergence of behavioural, subjective, and efficiency data supports the hypothesis that intracorporeal exchange preserves visual attention and may reduce perceived workload. Larger, adequately powered studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.