ArticleNature methods2026
SVPG: a pangenome-based structural variant detection approach and rapid augmentation of pangenome graphs with new samples.
Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GFSeeker: a splicing-graph-based approach for accurate gene fusion detection from long-read RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breakthrough advances in long-read sequencing have opened unprecedented opportunities to study genetic variations through pangenome analysis, yet tools that effectively leverage such frameworks for structural variant (SV) detection remain limited. In addition, efficient construction of pangenome graphs becomes increasingly challenging with the acquisition of larger numbers of samples. Here we present SVPG, an approach that leverages haplotype-resolved pangenome reference for accurate SV detection and rapid pangenome graph augmentation from long-read sequencing data. Compared with state-of-the-art SV callers, SVPG maintained superior overall performance across different sequencing technologies and coverages. SVPG also achieved notable improvements in calling individual-specific SVs, including rare and somatic SVs. Furthermore, in a benchmark involving 20 samples, SVPG accelerated pangenome graph augmentation by nearly tenfold compared with traditional augmentation strategies. These results indicate that SVPG has the potential to improve SV detection and serve as an effective tool, offering new possibilities for advancing pangenomic research.
Identifiers
42768106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.