ArticleNature communications2026
Electricity load forecasting under extreme heat and cold waves.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electricity load forecasting under extreme heat and cold waves.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extreme heat and cold waves can push electricity demand beyond the conditions for which power systems are routinely planned, increasing the risk of shortages and blackouts. Accurate load forecasts are therefore critical because they give operators the lead time needed to keep supply and demand in balance. Because such events are rare, forecasting models are trained mostly on ordinary weather conditions and often fail when demand patterns shift during extremes. Here we show that Extreme Synthesis-Disentanglement Forecasting, a data-centered approach that generates realistic examples of extreme weather and filters them to retain reliable demand signals, improves electricity load forecasting under heat and cold waves. Across 80 real-world datasets from six regions, this approach reduces two standard measures of forecasting error by 9.8-33.5% and 7.5-34.5%, respectively, compared with leading models. These improvements offer a practical way to support more reliable power-system operation as climate extremes intensify.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.