Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42768012›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026

Changing the motivation for mental work with temporal interference stimulation.

Gizem Vural, Sarina Drexler, Daniel Keeser, Alexander Soutschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gizem VuralDepartment for Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sarina DrexlerDepartment for Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel KeeserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-1024
Alexander SoutschekDepartment for Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany. soutschek_a@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-7721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful goal-directed behavior often requires the exertion of effortful control processes. The striatum is thought to play a key role in determining whether a goal is worth the required cognitive effort, but whether and how the striatum causally influences effort-based decisions in humans remains unclear. Here, we address this gap by employing transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS), a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique capable of targeting deeper brain regions. In particular, we applied striatum-targeted tTIS to healthy participants performing an effort-based decision task during functional MRI scanning. Supporting the idea that the striatum encodes both the benefits and costs of actions, we found that, on the behavioral level, striatum-targeted tTIS increased the sensitivity to both reward magnitudes and effort costs. At the neural level, this was mirrored by stronger representations of effort demands in the striatum under stimulation as well as by enhanced functional coupling between the striatum and the anterior cingulate cortex, a region at the intersection of motivation and cognition. Together, our findings provide insights into how striatum-targeted stimulation influences trade-offs between rewards and effort costs, informing neural accounts of motivated cognition and suggesting novel neural interventions for the treatment of amotivation.

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumDecision MakingGyrus CinguliMotivationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42768012
PMCPMC13594324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.