ArticleAnnals of family medicine2026
Quality Improvement in Residency: Training, Projects, and Outcomes.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality improvement (QI) is a core component of family medicine residency training, preparing physicians to lead system-level changes and deliver value-based care. However, there is no standardized curriculum or metric for evaluating success of residency QI projects and a lack of consensus on best practices for QI education and assessment in graduate medical education. We sought to characterize the current landscape of QI curricula in US family medicine residencies, including pedagogic methods, project requirements, faculty roles, and perceived markers of success and barriers.
methodsThis study was part of the 2025 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance cross-sectional survey of family medicine residency program directors. Survey question topics included QI training, project logistics, characteristics, and outcomes. We analyzed data by descriptive statistics and χ
resultsThe response rate was 44.2% (321/726). Programs reported using a residency-developed (38.8%) or hybrid (46.8%) QI curriculum, and most oversight was provided by core faculty (54.2%). Residents' access to QI data was typically limited (44.6%) or full (27.6%), and QI projects were often structured in resident teams (45.2%). Graduate QI proficiency was mostly rated as intermediate (63.5%). Greater graduate proficiency was significantly associated with programs reporting hybrid curricula, fewer barriers to data access, continuity of projects, and greater dissemination and implementation of project outcomes (all
conclusionsTraining and project characteristics linked to outcome measures, including resident proficiency and clinical practice change, highlight the need for more standardized and longitudinal approaches to QI training in family medicine residencies.Abstract available in: يبرع (Arabic); (Chinese); Francais (French); Deutsch (German); हिन्दी (Hindi); Indonesian (Indonesian); (Japanese); Portugues (Portuguese); Español (Spanish).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.