Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2026
Social Support in Group Medical Visits for Chronic Pain in Primary Care.
Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSocial support is associated with improved outcomes for people with chronic pain and is an important but understudied component of biopsychosocial pain care. We sought to explore how group medical visits facilitate 4 distinct types of social support-emotional, appraisal, informational, and instrumental-among primary care patients with chronic pain.
methodsWe collected qualitative data within a randomized trial of integrative group medical visits for chronic pain, focusing on 2 cohorts of English-speaking patients randomized to group medical visits. Data came from 16 observed group medical visits, 2 focus groups, and 12 semistructured interviews. The group medical visit intervention entailed 12 weekly sessions combining clinical care, pain education, mindfulness meditation, therapeutic movement, and facilitated discussion. We analyzed data using team-based flexible coding and codebook thematic analysis.
resultsThe 26 participating patients were predominantly low-income (80.8% had an annual household income of less than $50,000); 50.0% identified as Black or African American, 15.4% as Hispanic or Latine, and 23.1% as White. On average, they had severe pain with a mean intensity rating of 7.7 out of 10. All 4 social support types emerged through structured program components (curriculum, facilitation strategies, program structure) and interactions among peers and facilitators. Emotional support fostered belonging and countered isolation and stigma. Appraisal support normalized struggles and fostered self-compassion. Informational support combined interactive education with peer-to-peer knowledge exchange. Instrumental support provided concrete assistance.
conclusionsOur findings illustrate how group medical visits for chronic pain mobilize 4 interwoven and reinforcing forms of social support as core therapeutic processes. They also highlight group medical visits as a potential model for biopsychosocial chronic pain management among primary care patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.