Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42767935›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Uncovering Latent Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Neural Bases of Problem-Solving Deficits in Children with Developmental Dyscalculia.

Oliver H M Lasnick, Yunji Park, Percy Mistry, Vinod Menon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliver H M LasnickDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ohml@stanford.edu menon@stanford.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-4135
Yunji ParkDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-9505
Percy MistryDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-4472
Vinod MenonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ohml@stanford.edu menon@stanford.edu.

Funding

Interventions in Math Learning Disabilities: Cognitive and Neural CorrelatesR01HD059205 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vinod Menon · 2009 to 2026
$10.8M
Longitudinal Neurocognitive Studies of Mathematical Disabilities: trajectories and outcomesR37HD094623 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vinod Menon · 2018 to 2026
$6.8M
Functional Brain Signatures of Learning Disabilities Across DevelopmentK99HD118172 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YUNJI PARK · 2026 to 2026
$128k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD118172NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059205NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD094623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental dyscalculia (DD) affects 7-10% of children and is characterized by persistent difficulties in arithmetic problem-solving, which depends on the dynamic interplay between cognitive and metacognitive control processes governing strategy execution and selection. Conventional behavioral and neuroimaging approaches do not simultaneously quantify these latent processes and link them to distributed neural mechanisms, leaving the neurocognitive and metacognitive underpinnings of DD insufficiently characterized. We integrated Bayesian computational modeling with whole-brain decoding to uncover cognitive, metacognitive, and neural bases of problem-solving deficits in DD using a sample of 68 children aged 8-10 years (38 female). Children with DD showed deficits across all problem-solving strategies (counting, retrieval, and decomposition), indicating reduced strategy execution efficiency. They also exhibited significant metacognitive impairments: longer baseline switching times between strategies, reduced sensitivity to problem difficulty, and lower adaptivity in selecting optimal strategies. Whole-brain Elastic Net decoding accurately distinguished DD from TA peers based on distributed activation patterns across frontoparietal cortex, hippocampus, and ventral-visual regions, whereas univariate approaches did not. Linear multivariate brain-behavioral analyses and nonlinear transformer-based predictions converged in showing that these distributed signatures predicted counting efficiency and switching sensitivity. Notably, brain-behavior relations reversed in direction between groups, positive in TA children but negative in DD, most strikingly in the hippocampus. These findings demonstrate that arithmetic difficulties in DD arise from deficits in both strategy execution efficiency and metacognitive control, reflecting an altered mapping between distributed neural activity, and highlight the power of integrating computational modeling with brain-wide decoding to understand learning disabilities.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionDyscalculiaMetacognitionProblem SolvingBayes TheoremBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological Testsdevelopmental dyscalculialatent cognitive mechanismsmultivariate analysisneural decoding

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.