ArticleBMJ open2026
Empowering youth with chronic conditions: enhancing sexual and reproductive health through evidence and engagement - protocol for a co-design approach.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdolescence and young adulthood (ages 15-24) are critical developmental periods that require comprehensive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education. Youth with chronic conditions like epilepsy, congenital heart disease (CHD) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) face unique SRH challenges, such as teratogenic medication risks and higher maternal mortality, yet often lack specialised counselling. A significant evidence gap exists in Canada regarding the SRH needs and access to care for this population. To address the SRH needs of youth with epilepsy, CHD and SLE, this project will apply community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles to meaningfully engage youth and co-design culturally relevant knowledge translation tools that enhance SRH information and care for these youth. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study employs a four-stage CBPR and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Alberta Research Ethics Board (Pro00165408). Informed consent will be secured from all participants. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, academic presentations, social media content (TikTok, Instagram) and a national Canadian conference. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The protocol for the scoping review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5SWTY).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.