ArticleBMJ open2026
Trends and inequities in antenatal care use in South and Southeast Asia, 1987-2022: evidence from demographic and health surveys.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine spatiotemporal trends, disparities and predictors of antenatal care (ANC) uptake in South and Southeast Asia from 1987 to 2022 using nationally representative demographic and health survey (DHS) data.
designPooled analysis of cross-sectional nationally representative demographic and health survey (DHS) data.
settingCommunity-based and household-based surveys conducted across 12 countries in South and Southeast Asia (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Timor-Leste and Vietnam), spanning standard DHS rounds from 1987 to 2022.
participants776 005 births with available information on ANC visits, drawn from a pooled birth-history dataset of 5 277 239 unique births across the 12 countries. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was adequate ANC use, defined as ≥4 ANC visits versus <4 (including none). Predictors were assessed using survey-weighted univariable and multivariable logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based variable selection, and geographic disparities were visualised using spatiotemporal maps by birth year.
resultsOverall, 50.1% of women received four or more ANC visits, increasing from 38.3% in 1985-1989 to 56.0% in 2020-2022. Over the same period, neonatal mortality declined from 50.6 to 19.1 per 1000 live births and maternal mortality from 770.9 to 187.2 per 100 000 live births. Adequate ANC use was higher among urban women (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.15, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.23), those with secondary or higher education (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.39) and those in the highest wealth quintile (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.05). Late ANC initiation was strongly associated with lower use (aOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.34). Higher odds were observed among women receiving ≥3 ANC components (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.02), daily television viewers (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.50) and women with decision-making autonomy (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.30).
conclusionANC use has improved over 30 years but remains insufficient and inequitable. Strengthening timely, high-quality ANC supported by women's empowerment and resilient primary care, outreach and referral will be crucial to achieve maternal and neonatal Sustainable Development Goals targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.