ArticleOpen heart2026
Optimal haemodynamic status and prognostic predictors in patients with right ventricular dysfunction: the RIGHT study.
Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence regarding optimal haemodynamic parameters and prognostic predictors in right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) remains limited. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between haemodynamic parameters and cardiac output (CO) in RVD and to identify clinically relevant prognostic predictors.
methodsThis retrospective, single-centre cohort study analysed data from patients with heart failure complicated by RVD between 2014 and 2024. RVD was defined as Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index <1.85 and right atrial pressure (RAP)/pulmonary artery wedge pressure ratio >0.63. Two substudies were conducted: Study A assessed the relationship between CO and haemodynamic parameters derived from right heart catheterisation (RHC) and Study B evaluated the prognostic value of haemodynamic indices in RVD. The primary outcome of Study B was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalisation.
resultsA total of 202 RHC examinations from 155 patients (median age 69 years, 66% male) were analysed. In Study A, cardiac output was highest at an RAP of approximately 10-15 mm Hg and declined beyond this level. CO showed a non-linear association with heart rate in sinus rhythm, reaching its peak at around 80 beats per minute. In Study B, 34 patients experienced the primary outcome during a median follow-up of 1.4 years. Those who experienced the primary outcome had higher RAP and lower pulmonary artery (PA) compliance. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, RAP >10 mm Hg (median) and PA compliance <4.9 mL/mm Hg (median) were associated with the primary outcome (p=0.004 and p=0.005, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, PA compliance <4.9 mL/mm Hg was a predictor of the primary outcome, while RAP >10 mm Hg was not.
conclusionsIn patients with RVD, CO was highest at an RAP of 10-15 mm Hg. Among those with sinus rhythm, heart rate showed a non-linear association with CO. Low PA compliance was a predictor of adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.