Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42767709›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science

Collaborative Wayfinding: A Critical Review.

Pablo Fernandez Velasco, John Sutton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Collaborative Wayfinding: A Critical Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo Fernandez VelascoCentre for the Sciences of Place and Memory, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7563-8170
John SuttonCentre for the Sciences of Place and Memory, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-9785

Funding

British Academy PFSS23\230053Leverhulme Trust LIP-2023_002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though people can navigate alone, collaborative wayfinding is ubiquitous in human life. Use of GPS devices does not inevitably make it easy to navigate together: conflict in collaborative wayfinding is familiar to most of us, as is failure at it. Yet we know little about how people find their way together. What mechanisms and conditions support effective group dynamics and performance? What difference does a shared history make in grounding communication and decision-making in wayfinding? Only in the last few years have these questions started to be addressed, but recent developments have come from separate disciplines in a disparate way, both methodologically and theoretically. We critically review recent experimental work. We then draw lessons from five mature fields in the study of collaborative cognition: social ontology, distributed cognition, transactive memory, group problem-solving, and collaborative recall. Sometimes, navigating together effectively depends on jointly remembering spatial information encoded together during earlier joint action. We suggest tractable designs to identify shared spatial knowledge and assess collaborative process gains and losses, alongside better methods to tap the microprocesses of embodied interaction in small groups remembering routes together. We suggest ways to test for emergence in collaborative wayfinding, and to assess varying divisions of cognitive labor in groups with matching or competing spatial capacities or strategies.

Indexed as

CognitionCooperative BehaviorSpatial NavigationGroup DynamicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42767709
PMCPMC13593399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.