ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Prioritizing removals of a highly cryptic invasive species using machine learning and demographic weighting.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prioritizing removals of a highly cryptic invasive species using machine learning and demographic weighting.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive species present substantial challenges to biodiversity conservation, particularly when low detectability and demographic heterogeneity obscure the population-level consequences of management actions. Invasive Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus) in South Florida exemplify this challenge, as metrics based on raw removals or body size alone may not reflect demographic impacts. To address this, we introduce the Weighted Removal Index (WRI), a demographic weighting framework that prioritizes removals based on expected contributions to survival and reproduction. Using survey data from the South Florida Water Management District's Python Elimination Program, we quantified operational and environmental conditions associated with higher survey WRI, defined as the summed WRI of all pythons captured on a single survey, and evaluated three forecasting approaches: Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), Boosted Regression Trees (BRT), and Neural Networks (NN). Survey WRI was highest under waning lunar phases, when surveys were assisted, and under warmer and more humid conditions. Additionally, survey WRI was elevated on warm days early in the wet season and cool dry-season days. In held-out test evaluation, the NN achieved the highest balanced accuracy for predicting survey success (0.703), and the lowest error for predicting survey WRI (root mean squared error [RMSE] = 5.50). Contractor performance was highly heterogeneous, with contractor-specific effects positively associated with mean survey WRI (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.