Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42767653›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Prioritizing removals of a highly cryptic invasive species using machine learning and demographic weighting.

Alexander S Romer, Melissa A Miller, Sergio A Balaguera-Reina, Michelle C Bassis, Brandon Welty, Michael Kirkland, Amy Peters, Edward F Metzger, Jenna Cole, LeRoy Rodgers and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Prioritizing removals of a highly cryptic invasive species using machine learning and demographic weighting.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander S RomerDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7882-4622
Melissa A MillerDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6743-6808
Sergio A Balaguera-ReinaDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-0031
Michelle C BassisDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.
Brandon WeltyDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.
Michael KirklandSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Amy PetersSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Edward F MetzgerSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Jenna ColeSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
LeRoy RodgersSouth Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Frank J MazzottiDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, Florida, USA.

Funding

South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) 4600004071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive species present substantial challenges to biodiversity conservation, particularly when low detectability and demographic heterogeneity obscure the population-level consequences of management actions. Invasive Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus) in South Florida exemplify this challenge, as metrics based on raw removals or body size alone may not reflect demographic impacts. To address this, we introduce the Weighted Removal Index (WRI), a demographic weighting framework that prioritizes removals based on expected contributions to survival and reproduction. Using survey data from the South Florida Water Management District's Python Elimination Program, we quantified operational and environmental conditions associated with higher survey WRI, defined as the summed WRI of all pythons captured on a single survey, and evaluated three forecasting approaches: Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), Boosted Regression Trees (BRT), and Neural Networks (NN). Survey WRI was highest under waning lunar phases, when surveys were assisted, and under warmer and more humid conditions. Additionally, survey WRI was elevated on warm days early in the wet season and cool dry-season days. In held-out test evaluation, the NN achieved the highest balanced accuracy for predicting survey success (0.703), and the lowest error for predicting survey WRI (root mean squared error [RMSE] = 5.50). Contractor performance was highly heterogeneous, with contractor-specific effects positively associated with mean survey WRI (R

Indexed as

BoidaeConservation of Natural ResourcesIntroduced SpeciesMachine LearningAnimalsDemographyFloridaModels, BiologicalPredictive Learning Modelsartificial intelligenceboosted regression treesBurmese pythoncontractor performanceecological modelingeverglades ecosystemgeneralized additive modelsinvasion ecologypredictive analyticsreproductive weightingreptile demographysurvivorship curve

Identifiers

PMID42767653
PMCPMC13593391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.