ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026
Real-Time Neurofeedback Training to Modulate Glutamate-Glutamine Concentration Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurofeedback training is a procedure in which participants learn to modulate brain activity through their own efforts. Here, we designed a real-time neurofeedback training using functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) to modulate the concentration of glutamate, a major excitatory neurotransmitter, and its precursor glutamine (collectively referred to as Glx) in a volume-of-interest (VOI) located in the occipital lobes. During an induction phase participants employed a self-selected strategy to increase or decrease Glx concentration relative to a reference concentration measured prior to neurofeedback training. Participants were informed about their performance after the induction phase by displaying a disk in green for success or red for failure. The disk size indicated the magnitude of success or failure. The procedure was repeated over the course of 30 trials. Participants were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups (15 participants per group). The experimental group received veridical feedback about their success or failure in the induction phase. The control group received random feedback. Glx concentration in the VOI was measured using 2-s-long consecutive Point RESolved Spectroscopy (PRESS) scans in a 3-Tesla MRI scanner. The results showed that depending on group assignment, participants in the experimental group learned to increase or decrease Glx concentration over the course of training. No significant changes in Glx concentration were observed in the control group. These findings suggest that, with the help of veridical performance feedback, participants learned to modulate Glx concentration in the VOI in the desired direction over a relatively short period of time. fMRS-based neurofeedback training may complement existing neurofeedback approaches by targeting neurotransmitter-related processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.