Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766890›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2026

"Kinlessness", friend and family support, and cognitive function by region and urbanicity in the United States.

Christine A Mair, Jingwen Liu, Rose Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine A MairUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA. Electronic address: christine_mair@umbc.edu.
Jingwen LiuNorth Carolina State University, USA.
Rose AndersonUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA.

Funding

Southern Population Aging Research Center (SPARC)P30AG097132 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI David F. Warner · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG097132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family structure and social support are important determinants of cognitive health in later life, yet little is known about how their associations with cognition vary across geographic contexts. This study examines how cognitive function among older adults varies by family structure, region, and urbanicity, with particular attention to the buffering effects of friend and extended family support. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (2006-2018; N = 19,976 respondents and 40,885 observations), we used multilevel mixed-effects models to analyze repeated measures of cognitive function across family structures, with a particular focus on older adults without partners or children ("kinless"). Fully adjusted results reveal that being unpartnered and/or childless is generally not associated with cognitive disadvantage except in specific geographic contexts, particularly in the West among unpartnered parents living in exurban areas and unpartnered childless adults living in suburban areas. In contrast, friend support is associated with better cognitive function in nearly all contexts, with especially consistent associations across the South, whereas extended family support shows no independent association with cognition. However, interaction analyses suggest that friend support may buffer cognitive disadvantage among "kinless" older adults in the urban West, while extended family support may buffer disadvantage among unpartnered parents in the exurban South. Together, these findings suggest that the cognitive consequences of family structure may be context dependent and that different forms of social support may play distinct compensatory roles for older adults aging with limited family ties.

Identifiers

PMID42766890
PMCPMC13597143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.