ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model to Predict Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a common and severe complication in patients with sepsis, characterized by microvascular thrombosis, systemic endothelial damage, and markedly increased short-term mortality. Existing traditional clinical risk scoring systems demonstrate limited accuracy and fail to capture complex, nonlinear physiological interactions, underscoring the urgent need for advanced prognostic tools. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model using large-scale, multicenter databases to predict early mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with SIC and to evaluate its predictive performance and clinical utility compared with traditional clinical risk scores. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of patients with SIC from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV), the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), and Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Feature selection was performed using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression, the Boruta algorithm, and recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, combined with multivariable logistic regression. Twelve ML algorithms were trained and compared with 4 traditional clinical scoring systems (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score) to predict 28-day mortality after ICU admission. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Furthermore, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were used to ensure model interpretability and to identify individual pathophysiological drivers. Results: A total of 7980 (66.3%) patients with SIC from the MIMIC-IV database, 3815 (31.7%) from the eICU-CRD database, and 235 (2.0%) from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were included in the study. Ten independent predictors were identified to construct the model. The XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting) model performed the best, with an AUC of 0.899 (95% CI 0.889-0.909) in the internal validation set and 0.882 and 0.904 in the 2 external validation sets, significantly outperforming traditional scoring systems and demonstrating higher clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis identified that the top 5 critical features were anion gap, red blood cell distribution width, lactate, total bilirubin, and age. Furthermore, an easy-to-use online tool, SIC Predict Streamlit, was developed based on this model to enable clinicians to quickly assess patient risk. Conclusions: The ML model developed in this study demonstrated superior accuracy, robustness, and generalizability in predicting early mortality in patients with SIC. The model outperformed traditional clinical scoring tools, and the findings provide valuable insights for prognostic assessment and the individualized management of patients with SIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.