Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766785›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2026

Effectiveness of Telehealth Care Interventions for Women's Mental Health During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Serena Kao, Athina Marina Metaxa, Ranin Soliman

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Serena KaoDepartment of Nutritional Science, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, United Kingdom, 44 (0)20 7836 5454, 44 (0)20 7123 484.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9924-186X
Athina Marina MetaxaCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4256-5486
Ranin SolimanCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-9067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has increased telemental health interventions. However, evidence of effectiveness in improving women's mental health outcomes, acceptability, and user satisfaction remains fragmented. Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of telehealth interventions in alleviating depression, anxiety, and stress in women during and after the pandemic and descriptively summarized the acceptability of and satisfaction with these interventions. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared telemental health interventions with control conditions (waitlists or standard care) for women experiencing anxiety, depression, or stress. Databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched through March 19, 2026. Eligible studies evaluated interventions in women aged 18 to 64 years (≥80% female participants and female-specific outcomes) and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized trials, and observational studies with ≥5 participants using outcome measures. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for depression, anxiety, and stress using RCT data. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: Fifty-seven studies (N=13,457) from 24 countries, reported the effectiveness, acceptability, and satisfaction with telehealth interventions. Meta-analysis of 23 studies (n=3269) demonstrated significant benefits of telehealth interventions for depression, anxiety, and stress. Depression showed the greatest improvements, with a moderate reduction in symptoms (Hedges Conclusions: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis focused on telemental health interventions for women. Telehealth was associated with moderate, small to moderate, and modest reductions in depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively, with benefits across female-only and predominantly female samples. Moderate to high heterogeneity in average effects (CIs), wide distributions of effects across settings (prediction intervals), and risk of bias resulted in moderate certainty of evidence. Overall, telehealth is a scalable approach for improving access to mental health care for women, although high-quality research is needed to strengthen the evidence base.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthTelemedicineWomen's HealthAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMental Health TeletherapyPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, Psychologicalanxietydepressiondigital healtheHealthevidence-based health caremeta-analysisPRISMAreviewstress, telemental health, telemedicine, mobile health, mental healthsystematic reviewtelehealthwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42766785
PMCPMC13592667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.