Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766722›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026

Generative AI Engagement and Perceived Nutrition-Oriented Feeding Practices Among Urban Indonesian Mothers: Mixed Methods Study.

Lia Nur Amalina, Ferdi Antonio, Surya Adiwena, Dewi Wuisan, Roy Glenn Massie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lia Nur AmalinaDepartment of Hospital Administration, Graduate School of Management, Pelita Harapan University, Jl. Garnisun Dalam No. 8, RT 5, RW 4, Karet Semanggi, Jakarta, Jakarta Special Capital Region, 12930, Indonesia, 62 812-1010-676.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8791-4632
Ferdi AntonioDepartment of Hospital Administration, Graduate School of Management, Pelita Harapan University, Jl. Garnisun Dalam No. 8, RT 5, RW 4, Karet Semanggi, Jakarta, Jakarta Special Capital Region, 12930, Indonesia, 62 812-1010-676.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1319-3732
Surya AdiwenaDepartment of Hospital Administration, Graduate School of Management, Pelita Harapan University, Jl. Garnisun Dalam No. 8, RT 5, RW 4, Karet Semanggi, Jakarta, Jakarta Special Capital Region, 12930, Indonesia, 62 812-1010-676.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0198-4341
Dewi WuisanDepartment of Hospital Administration, Graduate School of Management, Pelita Harapan University, Jl. Garnisun Dalam No. 8, RT 5, RW 4, Karet Semanggi, Jakarta, Jakarta Special Capital Region, 12930, Indonesia, 62 812-1010-676.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-3659
Roy Glenn MassieHealth Policy, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9980-8841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Asia-Pacific region faces an escalating double burden of malnutrition, with childhood obesity now affecting more than 113 million children aged 0-19 years. A demographic of highly educated, digitally literate urban mothers-referred to in this study using the descriptive label "Alpha Mother"-increasingly draws on generative AI as a source of toddler nutrition information. Yet, whether this shift empowers or undermines quality feeding practices remains empirically untested. Objective: This study examined how generative artificial intelligence (AI) engagement is associated with perceived nutrition-oriented feeding practices among urban Alpha Mothers in Indonesia, with cognitive empowerment and parental self-compassion as intervening variables, and eHealth self-efficacy as a moderator. The study contextually refined 5 AI engagement dimensions, organized through an AI parenting nutrition alignment approach. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used. Phase 1 comprised semistructured interviews with 10 Alpha Mothers and used hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis to contextually refine 5 literature-informed AI engagement constructs: AI algorithmic trust, AI health information quality, AI personalization fit perception, AI information-seeking intensity, and AI social proof sensitivity. These informed a survey instrument developed through the qualitative phase and refined against previously validated scales in phase 2, recruiting 442 respondents across 4 Indonesian urban centers. A 14-hypothesis structural model was tested using PLS-SEM (partial least squares-structural equation modeling). Results: Twelve of 14 hypotheses were supported. The model demonstrated substantial explanatory power for cognitive empowerment ( Conclusions: The findings suggest that generative AI engagement is associated with perceived nutrition-oriented feeding practices via 2 distinct indirect associations examined in this study: cognitive empowerment and parental self-compassion. These associations were strongest when mothers trusted the AI system and perceived its recommendations as fitting their child and household realities, indicating that the perceived value of AI in toddler feeding may lie less in algorithmic sophistication than in its capacity to build trust, fit context, and support maternal judgment. Because the outcome reflects maternal perception rather than observed feeding behavior or child nutrition outcomes, these findings should be interpreted as associational. They may nonetheless inform future research on AI-assisted feeding support that complements, rather than replaces, professional nutrition counseling.

Indexed as

cognitive empowermentfeeding behaviorgenerative artificial intelligencehealth literacyIndonesiamothersparental self-compassionparentingself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42766722
PMCPMC13592562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.