ArticlePloS one2026
Spatial perspective-taking abilities on ambiguous tactile stimuli: The case of children with autism spectrum disorder or developmental coordination disorder.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial perspective-taking corresponds to the ability to adopt someone else's point of view. Abnormalities in visual perspective-taking have been reported in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and developmental coordination disorder (DCD), which are highly comorbid conditions. This study explored the developmental aspects of perspective-taking in the tactile modality in typically developing children and children with NDD. A total of 107 children, aged between 6 and 17 years, completed the study: 74 were typically developing (TD) and 33 had a neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) (24 had ASD and 9 had DCD). We used a graphesthesia task to investigate the perspectives adopted by children when interpreting ambiguous tactile symbols (b, d, p and q) presented on their stomach. The children's responses to the stimuli allowed us to infer the perspective they had adopted to interpret them: egocentric (head- or trunk-centred) or decentred. The spontaneous perspective was predominantly egocentric (82% and 77% for TD and NDD groups, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups. During S2 and S3, in which we imposed a perspective on participants, accuracy increased with age for both groups. Additionally, the NDD group demonstrated significantly lower accuracy than the TD group in session 2. Response times (RT) were similar, except for the imposed decentered perspective. RT was significantly higher in the NDD group than for the TD group. From a developmental perspective, our findings highlight the embodied strategy involved in perspective-taking in the tactile modality, as well as its specificities in children with NDD. We discuss our results in relation to possible impairments in developmental dimensions, including inhibitory control and multisensory integration amongst those with ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.