Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766618›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Evaluating the effects of inhibitory control training as a universal prevention strategy for internalizing complaints in middle childhood.

Elizabeth J Edwards, Khanh Linh Chu, Annemaree Carroll, Emily Ross, Kristof Hoorelbeke, Annabel De Clercq

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth J EdwardsSchool of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7549-205X
Khanh Linh ChuSchool of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Annemaree CarrollSchool of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Emily RossSchool of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-6549
Kristof HoorelbekeDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Annabel De ClercqDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4607-9961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internalizing complaints or inwardly directed psychological difficulties such as anxiety, worry and low mood can significantly affect children's emotional well-being and daily functioning. If left untreated, these difficulties can persist into adulthood. Growing evidence has reported the critical role of cognitive control (ability to regulate attention and memory processes) in the development and maintenance of emotional problems such as anxiety. Cognitive control training has shown promise in reducing emotional vulnerability in adults and adolescents. However, studies with children are scant. The present study examined the potential of a gamified inhibitory control training as a universal prevention strategy aimed at reducing emotional vulnerability in children. Given the link between inhibitory control and math achievement (i.e., greater inhibitory control associated with higher math achievement), we also explored whether 15 sessions of daily training could improve math performance. Our randomized controlled trial, conducted in accordance with a pre-registered, published protocol, used a 2 (Group: Inhibitory control training group, n = 62; vs. Active control group, n = 61) × 4 (Time: pre- vs. post-training vs. 1-month vs. 3-month follow-up) design in a non-selected sample of Australian children aged 8-11 years (N = 123). Emotional, cognitive and academic measures were collected at each timepoint. Intention-to-treat analyses using linear mixed models showed no evidence of proximal transfer to untrained inhibitory control measures and limited evidence of beneficial distal transfer to emotional or academic outcomes, with some outcomes showing trends favouring the active control condition. The absence of broader emotional and academic benefits may therefore reflect the lack of improvement in the targeted cognitive process itself. These findings highlight important considerations regarding the design and delivery of cognitive training interventions to universal samples, including the calibration of task demands and the conditions required to support cognitive transfer. Future research should investigate whether stronger transfer effects can be achieved through adaptive training tasks that maintain optimal cognitive challenge, extended or higher-dose training protocols, and interventions targeting children with elevated emotional vulnerability or inhibitory control difficulties.

Indexed as

AnxietyCognitive TrainingInhibition, PsychologicalChildCognitionEmotionsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID42766618
PMCPMC13592700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.