ArticlePloS one2026
Concussion in live sport broadcast coverage: How do the public perceive it?
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sport-concussion is widely reported in the mass media. This reporting includes live sport broadcasts that reach, and influence, widespread audiences. From a public health perspective, broadcast information about concussion should be accurate. An understanding of public perceptions of sport-concussion coverage is needed to understand potential impacts. One-hundred and sixty-three people completed an online cross-sectional survey. The survey comprised structured and open-ended questions to gather perceptions about the media portrayal of sport-concussions (portrayal-perceptions) in sport broadcasts, and recommendations to improve it (recommendations). Twelve of 30 portrayal-perceptions were endorsed (agreed or disagreed) by >50% of respondents, including that the portrayal should be improved. Ten of 12 recommendations were agreed, including that the portrayal should prioritise player health. No statistically significant differences in perceptions were found based on participant background (e.g., their concussion history). This research, through considering the way people experience sport-concussion coverage, elucidates its potential to shape understanding about sport-concussion and its management. Community members support changes to the media portrayal of sport-concussion to increase its informative value for audiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.