ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of wastewater SARS-CoV-2 surveillance for monitoring COVID-19 trends and early warning in Sweden, 2023-2024.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wastewater surveillance (WWS) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels offers a way to monitor virus circulation independently of clinical testing. With COVID-19 now endemic, clarifying the role of WWS within routine surveillance is essential. The aim was to evaluate the potential of WWS as an early warning indicator for COVID-19 in Sweden, based on its correlation with reported case data. The study includes data from July 2023 to December 2024, from 19 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), covering 43% of Sweden's population, and surveillance data of reported COVID-19 cases. Analyses were performed by WWTP, separately for Stockholm (4 WWTPs) and at a national level (19 WWTPs). We compared wastewater SARS-CoV-2 levels to reported COVID-19 cases using cross-correlation and prediction metrics following trend classification. Correlations and classification metrics were highest without time shifts. SARS-CoV-2 levels in wastewater were strongly correlated with reported COVID-19 cases, with median cross-correlation values of 0.80 across all WWTPs and 0.87 at Stockholm and national levels. Positive predictive values of wastewater data to reported cases ranged from 63-74%, and negative predictive values from 85-95%. Sensitivity and specificity in Stockholm reached 78% and 87%; at national level, 72% and 84%, respectively. Under the evaluated weekly sampling and reporting system, WWS did not demonstrate a consistent early-warning advantage over reported cases but may support monitoring of trends when clinical testing is reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.