ArticlePloS one2026
Virtual reality, machine learning, and statistical modeling reveal an association between multiple concussion history and impaired perceptual decision-making.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current clinical assessment methods are insufficiently sensitive for detection of subtle post-concussion impairments in perceptual-cognitive function. The purpose of this study was to search for any perceptual response metrics associated with concussion history that might increase understanding of altered brain-behavior relationships. Immersive virtual reality test data were aggregated for 202 healthy adolescents and young adults (116 males, 86 females) who participated in different studies over a 2-year period. Left- versus right-directed neck rotation, arm reach, and step-lunge responses to sequential presentations of 2 types of horizontally moving visual stimuli were measured in terms of time to initiation of body segment movement (perceptual latency [PL]), as well as response completion (response time [RT]). Speed-accuracy tradeoff was represented by rate correct per second for PL (RCS-PL) and RT (RCS-RT) of neck and arm movements, and across-trial inconsistency was represented by PL variability (PLV) and RT variability (RTV). Both supervised machine learning and theory-based statistical regression methods were used to identify metrics that best discriminated between participants who reported a history of no concussion (NC), single concussion (SC), NC + SC, or multiple concussions (MC). Additionally, statistical regression was used to assess a theoretical relationship between metrics believed to align with components of the drift-diffusion computational model of decision-making. The best metric for discrimination between NC + SC and MC was Neck RCS-PL. Neck PLV values demonstrated a strong inverse logarithmic correlation with Neck RCS-PL (r = -0.796, P < 0.001). The Neck RCS-PL and Neck PLV behavioral metrics may have relevance to the two components of the drift-diffusion computational model of perceptual decision-making, and their combination may be associated with a cumulative and persisting deficiency after having sustained more than one lifetime concussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.