Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766589›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Updates to the EU Directives on Professional Qualifications must align with global standards.

Lia Brigante, Anna Af Ugglas, Daniela Drandic, Jacqueline Dunkley Bent, Margrieta Langins, Mervi Jokinen, Kerry Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lia BriganteInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-9135
Anna Af UgglasInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.
Daniela DrandicInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-7734
Jacqueline Dunkley BentInternational Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, Netherlands.
Margrieta LanginsWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1424-7309
Mervi JokinenEuropean Forum of National Nursing and Midwifery Associations, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9212-5423
Kerry PhillipsWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Midwifery Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-3270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Directive on Minimum Professional Qualifications: Midwife is under review as part of an ongoing regulatory update. This revision presents a critical opportunity to modernise the regulation of midwifery education and practice across the EU and EEA, having implications that extend beyond the region, given the EU's role in influencing professional regulation globally. We argue that updates to the Directive must be aligned with current scientific evidence, Global Standards for the profession, and relevant World Health Organization guidelines. Aligning the Directive with these evidence-based standards is essential to ensure high-quality care, enable midwives to practise to their full scope, support workforce mobility, and strengthen health systems across Europe.

Identifiers

PMID42766589
PMCPMC13592594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.