ArticlePloS one2026
Embedded dyads: How the personal network relates to linguistic accommodation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language serves as a key medium through which individuals express and negotiate social belonging. By observing individuals' behavior within an interaction, we can access the relational stance they adopt and infer the social relationships that link the two interactants. This process is particularly studied within the framework of the Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT). According to CAT, speakers tend to align linguistically with their interlocutors to signal social proximity. Yet, most analyses remain focused on the psychological and dyadic levels, without considering the broader social influences that may shape linguistic choices. In this paper, we argue that considering the relational structure surrounding both interactants is crucial. In particular, we hypothesize that the position of the interlocutor within the speaker's personal network is a key factor driving linguistic behavior. To address this, we conducted an exploratory empirical investigation with 21 young adults who recorded themselves in an average of three interactions each (resulting in a total of 71 discussions). Their personal networks and linguistic data were both collected. Linguistic similarity was operationalized via the Manhattan distance of intensifier frequency between the respondent (ego) and the interlocutor (alter). We used Generalized Estimating Equation models to test our hypotheses. Results indicate that speakers tend to align linguistically with their interlocutors when the latter occupy a central position within a compositionally homogeneous cluster-that is, when the alter is embedded in a structurally dense subgroup composed of individuals originating from the same social domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.