Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766578›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Embedded dyads: How the personal network relates to linguistic accommodation.

Guillaume P Fernandez, Eric D Widmer, Robin Dodsworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillaume P FernandezDepartment of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-5665
Eric D WidmerDepartment of Sociology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Robin DodsworthDepartment of English, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-8334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language serves as a key medium through which individuals express and negotiate social belonging. By observing individuals' behavior within an interaction, we can access the relational stance they adopt and infer the social relationships that link the two interactants. This process is particularly studied within the framework of the Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT). According to CAT, speakers tend to align linguistically with their interlocutors to signal social proximity. Yet, most analyses remain focused on the psychological and dyadic levels, without considering the broader social influences that may shape linguistic choices. In this paper, we argue that considering the relational structure surrounding both interactants is crucial. In particular, we hypothesize that the position of the interlocutor within the speaker's personal network is a key factor driving linguistic behavior. To address this, we conducted an exploratory empirical investigation with 21 young adults who recorded themselves in an average of three interactions each (resulting in a total of 71 discussions). Their personal networks and linguistic data were both collected. Linguistic similarity was operationalized via the Manhattan distance of intensifier frequency between the respondent (ego) and the interlocutor (alter). We used Generalized Estimating Equation models to test our hypotheses. Results indicate that speakers tend to align linguistically with their interlocutors when the latter occupy a central position within a compositionally homogeneous cluster-that is, when the alter is embedded in a structurally dense subgroup composed of individuals originating from the same social domain.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsLanguageLinguisticsAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42766578
PMCPMC13592575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.