Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766547›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Experimental study on the engineering performance of LSP stabilized expansive soil under cyclic drying-wetting condition.

Lin Qin, Jie Li, Fusheng Zha, Long Xu, Bo Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin QinSchool of Intelligent Construction and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University, Hefei, China.
Jie LiChina Jikan Research Institute of Engineering Investigations and Design, Co., Ltd., Xi'an, China.
Fusheng ZhaSchool of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Long XuSchool of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-0831
Bo KangSchool of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional binders to treat expansive soil commonly present challenges of high cost and significant environmental burdens. To address these limitations, this study proposes an environmentally sustainable binder termed LSP (lime-sodium silicate amended phosphogypsum) based on the valorization of phosphogypsum (PG). Systematic laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate the engineering performance of LSP stabilized soil under drying-wetting cycles. Results indicate that the expansive soil stabilized with LSP obtains a higher maximum dry density and a lower optimum moisture content. The swelling-shrink potential is weakened as well. However, the successive D-W cycles imposes detrimental impacts on the development of all the geotechnical indexes, including free swelling index, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), shear strength, compressibility and permeability. LSP reduces FSI from 58.6% to 32.1%; UCS decreases by 26.5% after 15 cycles; permeability increases 1.65-fold. XRD and MIP analyses reveal that physical filling by PG powder constitutes the primary mechanism for the improvement of soil engineering properties, while micro-crack development is the controlled mechanism for the deterioration induced by D-W cycles.

Indexed as

Calcium CompoundsCalcium SulfateSilicatesSoilCompressive StrengthDesiccationPermeabilityWettabilityCalcium CompoundsCalcium SulfateSilicatessodium silicateSoil

Identifiers

PMID42766547
PMCPMC13592633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.